Sample Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Online, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Questions

Blog Article

Tags: Sample Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Online, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Questions, Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Fee, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Useful Dumps, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Valid Test Sample

Our company is a professional certificate exam materials provider, and we have worked on this industry for years, therefore we have rich experiences. Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps of us have questions and answers, and it will be easier for you to check the right answers after practicing. Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Braindumps are famous for high quality, we use the shilled professionals to compile them, and the quality is guarantee. Furthermore, our professional technicians will check the safety of our website, and we will provide you with a safe shopping environment.

It means you can use the Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) PDF version of Prep4pass anywhere at any time on the smart device you have. Our team of professionals continuously updates the collection of Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate PDF Questions according to changes in the real test's content. Due to these regular updates, you will get a better experience.

>> Sample Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Online <<

Pass Guaranteed Databricks - Professional Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate - Sample Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Test Online

In informative level, we should be more efficient. In order to take the initiative, we need to have a strong ability to support the job search. And how to get the test Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certification in a short time, which determines enough Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate qualification certificates to test our learning ability and application level. Our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions are specially designed to meet this demand for our worthy customers. As long as you study with our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate learning guide, you will pass the exam and get the certification for sure.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Assembling and Deploying Applications: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers get knowledge about coding a chain using a pyfunc mode, coding a simple chain using langchain, and coding a simple chain according to requirements. Additionally, the topic focuses on basic elements needed to create a RAG application. Lastly, the topic addresses sub-topics about registering the model to Unity Catalog using MLflow.
Topic 2	Governance: Generative AI Engineers who take the exam get knowledge about masking techniques, guardrail techniques, and legal licensing requirements in this topic.
Topic 3	Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q26-Q31):

NEW QUESTION # 26
When developing an LLM application, it's crucial to ensure that the data used for training the model complies with licensing requirements to avoid legal risks.
Which action is NOT appropriate to avoid legal risks?

A. Use any available data you personally created which is completely original and you can decide what license to use.
B. Only use data explicitly labeled with an open license and ensure the license terms are followed.
C. Reach out to the data curators directly before you have started using the trained model to let them know.
D. Reach out to the data curators directly after you have started using the trained model to let them know.

Answer: D

Explanation:
* Problem Context: When using data to train a model, it's essential to ensure compliance with licensing to avoid legal risks. Legal issues can arise from using data without permission, especially when it comes from third-party sources.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Reaching out to data curatorsbeforeusing the data is an appropriate action. This allows you to ensure you have permission or understand the licensing terms before starting to use the data in your model.
* Option B: Usingoriginal datathat you personally created is always a safe option. Since you have full ownership over the data, there are no legal risks, as you control the licensing.
* Option C: Using data that is explicitly labeled with an open license and adhering to the license terms is a correct and recommended approach. This ensures compliance with legal requirements.
* Option D: Reaching out to the data curatorsafteryou have already started using the trained model isnot appropriate. If you've already used the data without understanding its licensing terms, you may have already violated the terms of use, which could lead to legal complications. It's essential to clarify the licensing termsbeforeusing the data, not after.
Thus,Option Dis not appropriate because it could expose you to legal risks by using the data without first obtaining the proper licensing permissions.

NEW QUESTION # 27
A Generative Al Engineer is helping a cinema extend its website's chat bot to be able to respond to questions about specific showtimes for movies currently playing at their local theater. They already have the location of the user provided by location services to their agent, and a Delta table which is continually updated with the latest showtime information by location. They want to implement this new capability In their RAG application.
Which option will do this with the least effort and in the most performant way?

A. Set up a task in Databricks Workflows to write the information in the Delta table periodically to an external database such as MySQL and query the information from there as part of the agent logic / tool implementation.
B. Query the Delta table directly via a SQL query constructed from the user's input using a text-to-SQL LLM in the agent logic / tool
C. Create a Feature Serving Endpoint from a FeatureSpec that references an online store synced from the Delta table. Query the Feature Serving Endpoint as part of the agent logic / tool implementation.
D. implementation. Write the Delta table contents to a text column.then embed those texts using an embedding model and store these in the vector index Look up the information based on the embedding as part of the agent logic / tool implementation.

Answer: C

Explanation:
The task is to extend a cinema chatbot to provide movie showtime information using a RAG application, leveraging user location and a continuously updated Delta table, with minimal effort and high performance.
Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Create a Feature Serving Endpoint from a FeatureSpec that references an online store synced from the Delta table. Query the Feature Serving Endpoint as part of the agent logic / tool implementation
* Databricks Feature Serving provides low-latency access to real-time data from Delta tables via an online store. Syncing the Delta table to a Feature Serving Endpoint allows the chatbot to query showtimes efficiently, integrating seamlessly into the RAG agent'stool logic. This leverages Databricks' native infrastructure, minimizing effort and ensuring performance.
* Databricks Reference:"Feature Serving Endpoints provide real-time access to Delta table data with low latency, ideal for production systems"("Databricks Feature Engineering Guide," 2023).
* Option B: Query the Delta table directly via a SQL query constructed from the user's input using a text-to-SQL LLM in the agent logic / tool
* Using a text-to-SQL LLM to generate queries adds complexity (e.g., ensuring accurate SQL generation) and latency (LLM inference + SQL execution). While feasible, it's less performant and requires more effort than a pre-built serving solution.
* Databricks Reference:"Direct SQL queries are flexible but may introduce overhead in real-time applications"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option C: Write the Delta table contents to a text column, then embed those texts using an embedding model and store these in the vector index. Look up the information based on the embedding as part of the agent logic / tool implementation
* Converting structured Delta table data (e.g., showtimes) into text, embedding it, and using vector search is inefficient for structured lookups. It's effort-intensive (preprocessing, embedding) and less precise than direct queries, undermining performance.
* Databricks Reference:"Vector search excels for unstructured data, not structured tabular lookups"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
* Option D: Set up a task in Databricks Workflows to write the information in the Delta table periodically to an external database such as MySQL and query the information from there as part of the agent logic / tool implementation
* Exporting to an external database (e.g., MySQL) adds setup effort (workflow, external DB management) and latency (periodic updates vs. real-time). It's less performant and more complex than using Databricks' native tools.
* Databricks Reference:"Avoid external systems when Delta tables provide real-time data natively"("Databricks Workflows Guide").
Conclusion: Option A minimizes effort by using Databricks Feature Serving for real-time, low-latency access to the Delta table, ensuring high performance in a production-ready RAG chatbot.

NEW QUESTION # 28
A Generative AI Engineer is building a Generative AI system that suggests the best matched employee team member to newly scoped projects. The team member is selected from a very large team. Thematch should be based upon project date availability and how well their employee profile matches the project scope. Both the employee profile and project scope are unstructured text.
How should the Generative Al Engineer architect their system?

A. Create a tool for finding available team members given project dates. Embed all project scopes into a vector store, perform a retrieval using team member profiles to find the best team member.
B. Create a tool for finding available team members given project dates. Embed team profiles into a vector store and use the project scope and filtering to perform retrieval to find the available best matched team members.
C. Create a tool for finding team member availability given project dates, and another tool that uses an LLM to extract keywords from project scopes. Iterate through available team members' profiles and perform keyword matching to find the best available team member.
D. Create a tool to find available team members given project dates. Create a second tool that can calculate a similarity score for a combination of team member profile and the project scope. Iterate through the team members and rank by best score to select a team member.

Answer: B

NEW QUESTION # 29
A Generative Al Engineer is setting up a Databricks Vector Search that will lookup news articles by topic within 10 days of the date specified An example query might be "Tell me about monster truck news around January 5th 1992". They want to do this with the least amount of effort.
How can they set up their Vector Search index to support this use case?

A. Include metadata columns for article date and topic to support metadata filtering.
B. pass the query directly to the vector search index and return the best articles.
C. Split articles by 10 day blocks and return the block closest to the query.
D. Create separate indexes by topic and add a classifier model to appropriately pick the best index.

Answer: A

Explanation:
The task is to set up a Databricks Vector Search index for news articles, supporting queries like "monster truck news around January 5th, 1992," with minimal effort. The index must filter by topic and a 10-day date range. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Split articles by 10-day blocks and return the block closest to the query
* Pre-splitting articles into 10-day blocks requires significant preprocessing and index management (e.g., one index per block). It's effort-intensive and inflexible for dynamic date ranges.
* Databricks Reference:"Static partitioning increases setup complexity; metadata filtering is preferred"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
* Option B: Include metadata columns for article date and topic to support metadata filtering
* Adding date and topic as metadata in the Vector Search index allows dynamic filtering (e.g., date
± 5 days, topic = "monster truck") at query time. This leverages Databricks' built-in metadata filtering, minimizing setup effort.
* Databricks Reference:"Vector Search supports metadata filtering on columns like date or category for precise retrieval with minimal preprocessing"("Vector Search Guide," 2023).
* Option C: Pass the query directly to the vector search index and return the best articles
* Passing the full query (e.g., "Tell me about monster truck news around January 5th, 1992") to Vector Search relies solely on embeddings, ignoring structured filtering for date and topic. This risks inaccurate results without explicit range logic.
* Databricks Reference:"Pure vector similarity may not handle temporal or categorical constraints effectively"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option D: Create separate indexes by topic and add a classifier model to appropriately pick the best index
* Separate indexes per topic plus a classifier model adds significant complexity (index creation, model training, maintenance), far exceeding "least effort." It's overkill for this use case.
* Databricks Reference:"Multiple indexes increase overhead; single-index with metadata is simpler"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
Conclusion: Option B is the simplest and most effective solution, using metadata filtering in a single Vector Search index to handle date ranges and topics, aligning with Databricks' emphasis on efficient, low-effort setups.

NEW QUESTION # 30
A Generative Al Engineer is building a system that will answer questions on currently unfolding news topics.
As such, it pulls information from a variety of sources including articles and social media posts. They are concerned about toxic posts on social media causing toxic outputs from their system.
Which guardrail will limit toxic outputs?

A. Reduce the amount of context Items the system will Include in consideration for its response.
B. Use only approved social media and news accounts to prevent unexpected toxic data from getting to the LLM.
C. Implement rate limiting
D. Log all LLM system responses and perform a batch toxicity analysis monthly.

Answer: B

Explanation:
The system answers questions on unfolding news topics using articles and social media, with a concern about toxic outputs from toxic inputs. A guardrail must limit toxicity in the LLM's responses. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Use only approved social media and news accounts to prevent unexpected toxic data from getting to the LLM
* Curating input sources (e.g., verified accounts) reduces exposure to toxic content at the data ingestion stage, directly limiting toxic outputs. This is a proactive guardrail aligned with data quality control.
* Databricks Reference:"Control input data quality to mitigate unwanted LLM behavior, such as toxicity"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks," 2023).
* Option B: Implement rate limiting
* Rate limiting controls request frequency, not content quality. It prevents overload but doesn't address toxicity in social media inputs or outputs.
* Databricks Reference: Rate limiting is for performance, not safety:"Use rate limits to manage compute load"("Generative AI Cookbook").
* Option C: Reduce the amount of context items the system will include in consideration for its response
* Reducing context might limit exposure to some toxic items but risks losing relevant information, and it doesn't specifically target toxicity. It's an indirect, imprecise fix.
* Databricks Reference: Context reduction is for efficiency, not safety:"Adjust context size based on performance needs"("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* Option D: Log all LLM system responses and perform a batch toxicity analysis monthly
* Logging and analyzing responses is reactive, identifying toxicity after it occurs rather than preventing it. Monthly analysis doesn't limit real-time toxic outputs.
* Databricks Reference: Monitoring is for auditing, not prevention:"Log outputs for post-hoc analysis, but use input filters for safety"("Building LLM-Powered Applications").
Conclusion: Option A is the most effective guardrail, proactively filtering toxic inputs from unverified sources, which aligns with Databricks' emphasis on data quality as a primary safety mechanism for LLM systems.

NEW QUESTION # 31
......

Our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam materials will help you pass the exam with the least time. You can pass your exam after learning 48 to 72 hours of our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps. Since we have a professional team to edit and verify the exam materials, therefore the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam materials are high-quality and accurate. Besides Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Dumps contain most of knowledge points of the exam, and you will have a good command of them in the process of learning. We are pass guarantee and money back guarantee. If you fail to pass the exam, we will refund your money.

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Questions: https://www.prep4pass.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate_exam-braindumps.html

Report this page

SAMPLE DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE TEST ONLINE, DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE TEST QUESTIONS

Sample Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Online, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Test Questions